<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Seth&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sethroberts.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sethroberts.net</link>
	<description>Personal Science, Self-Experimentation, Scientific Method</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:21:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Next Meeting of Make Yourself Healthy Group by Sara Lake</title>
		<link>http://blog.sethroberts.net/2013/05/07/next-meeting-of-make-yourself-healthy-group/#comment-1114758</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara Lake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sethroberts.net/?p=10372#comment-1114758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you. Please post on your blog if you sort something out. I may just go ahead anyway.. it seems quite straightforward :-/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. Please post on your blog if you sort something out. I may just go ahead anyway.. it seems quite straightforward :-/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Give and Take by Adam Grant by ken</title>
		<link>http://blog.sethroberts.net/2013/05/20/give-and-take-by-adam-grant/#comment-1114722</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 04:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sethroberts.net/?p=10353#comment-1114722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a great book about improv acting called Impro by Keith Johnstone. A reliable way to get a laugh as an improv actor is to change the social status you are playing on stage. If I recall the book correctly, it postulated that students respect/fear the teacher who plays high-status; they can appreciate the teaching who always plays low status; but they love the teacher who vacillates back and forth between the two extremes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a great book about improv acting called Impro by Keith Johnstone. A reliable way to get a laugh as an improv actor is to change the social status you are playing on stage. If I recall the book correctly, it postulated that students respect/fear the teacher who plays high-status; they can appreciate the teaching who always plays low status; but they love the teacher who vacillates back and forth between the two extremes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Give and Take by Adam Grant by George</title>
		<link>http://blog.sethroberts.net/2013/05/20/give-and-take-by-adam-grant/#comment-1114685</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sethroberts.net/?p=10353#comment-1114685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, Grant showed &lt;i&gt;humility&lt;/i&gt; - how this can be seen as anything other than a concession to your audience&#039;s sense of self-importance I do not know. I guess I&#039;ll have to read the book to find out, but I hope it isn&#039;t just another attempt to explain something fairly simple through over-complicated theories in an attempt to be original. In any event, showing humility is always a disarming strategy and can reduce ill-will, resentment, jealousy, and thus reduce attempts to &quot;take you down&quot;.

&lt;strong&gt;Seth: Is it humble to state the obvious, in this case your age? Humility is usually about more subtle characteristics, such as wisdom. Maybe Grant was humble in what he said next (which he doesn&#039;t tell us), after the joke about being 12 years old.&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Grant showed <i>humility</i> &#8211; how this can be seen as anything other than a concession to your audience&#8217;s sense of self-importance I do not know. I guess I&#8217;ll have to read the book to find out, but I hope it isn&#8217;t just another attempt to explain something fairly simple through over-complicated theories in an attempt to be original. In any event, showing humility is always a disarming strategy and can reduce ill-will, resentment, jealousy, and thus reduce attempts to &#8220;take you down&#8221;.</p>
<p><strong>Seth: Is it humble to state the obvious, in this case your age? Humility is usually about more subtle characteristics, such as wisdom. Maybe Grant was humble in what he said next (which he doesn&#8217;t tell us), after the joke about being 12 years old.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Give and Take by Adam Grant by Tom</title>
		<link>http://blog.sethroberts.net/2013/05/20/give-and-take-by-adam-grant/#comment-1114679</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sethroberts.net/?p=10353#comment-1114679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The book is awesome. 

Really looking forward to hearing more of your insights on it, Seth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The book is awesome. </p>
<p>Really looking forward to hearing more of your insights on it, Seth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Give and Take by Adam Grant by vic</title>
		<link>http://blog.sethroberts.net/2013/05/20/give-and-take-by-adam-grant/#comment-1114676</link>
		<dc:creator>vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 23:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sethroberts.net/?p=10353#comment-1114676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He penetrated his audience&#039;s defenses with a disarming joke - hardly rocket science.  I hope there is more to the book than this...

&lt;strong&gt;Seth: Was his audience &quot;defensive&quot; as you say? Not clear from Grant&#039;s description. As for the &quot;disarming&quot; joke, the question is why was it disarming? Lots of jokes at the start of talks have roughly zero effect, as far as I can tell.&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He penetrated his audience&#8217;s defenses with a disarming joke &#8211; hardly rocket science.  I hope there is more to the book than this&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Seth: Was his audience &#8220;defensive&#8221; as you say? Not clear from Grant&#8217;s description. As for the &#8220;disarming&#8221; joke, the question is why was it disarming? Lots of jokes at the start of talks have roughly zero effect, as far as I can tell.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Give and Take by Adam Grant by George</title>
		<link>http://blog.sethroberts.net/2013/05/20/give-and-take-by-adam-grant/#comment-1114649</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sethroberts.net/?p=10353#comment-1114649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wait a minute, what Grant did was extremely obvious and easily replicated in many situations - he was sensitive to the &lt;i&gt;ego&lt;/i&gt; of his audience. He understood that old people resent being taught wisdom by young people - a fairly obvious observation that any of us might make - and acknowledged that he was in fact, inferior to his audience in wisdom but had a special message to relate, thus pleasing their ego and allowing them then listen to his message.  It is quite common for people to let their ego and sense of self-importance make them close-minded - if you can disarm their ego defenses, they listen to you more.

This is basic stuff - in ANY situation being sensitive to the ego of your audience will disarm potential mind-closing resentment and increase receptivity to the message.

&lt;strong&gt;Seth: You might be right. But it&#039;s far from &quot;extremely obvious&quot;. Grant explains it quite differently.&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a minute, what Grant did was extremely obvious and easily replicated in many situations &#8211; he was sensitive to the <i>ego</i> of his audience. He understood that old people resent being taught wisdom by young people &#8211; a fairly obvious observation that any of us might make &#8211; and acknowledged that he was in fact, inferior to his audience in wisdom but had a special message to relate, thus pleasing their ego and allowing them then listen to his message.  It is quite common for people to let their ego and sense of self-importance make them close-minded &#8211; if you can disarm their ego defenses, they listen to you more.</p>
<p>This is basic stuff &#8211; in ANY situation being sensitive to the ego of your audience will disarm potential mind-closing resentment and increase receptivity to the message.</p>
<p><strong>Seth: You might be right. But it&#8217;s far from &#8220;extremely obvious&#8221;. Grant explains it quite differently.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Give and Take by Adam Grant by Alex Chernavsky</title>
		<link>http://blog.sethroberts.net/2013/05/20/give-and-take-by-adam-grant/#comment-1114626</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Chernavsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sethroberts.net/?p=10353#comment-1114626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of months ago, The &lt;i&gt;New York Times Magazine&lt;/i&gt; ran a cover story about Grant and his research:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/31/magazine/is-giving-the-secret-to-getting-ahead.html?pagewanted=all&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/31/magazine/is-giving-the-secret-to-getting-ahead.html&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of months ago, The <i>New York Times Magazine</i> ran a cover story about Grant and his research:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/31/magazine/is-giving-the-secret-to-getting-ahead.html?pagewanted=all" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/31/magazine/is-giving-the-secret-to-getting-ahead.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Give and Take by Adam Grant by Tim Beneke</title>
		<link>http://blog.sethroberts.net/2013/05/20/give-and-take-by-adam-grant/#comment-1114621</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Beneke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sethroberts.net/?p=10353#comment-1114621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps with the generals he established his insight immediately by getting inside what many were already thinking -- with humor (emotion). They were then attached to perceiving him as &quot;insightful&quot; and framed his observations that way, had a positive cognitive bias that led to confirmation bias as they heard him talk. In working with other people for the first time, I always try hard to impress them initially.... 

It&#039;s a fascinating story...

&lt;strong&gt;Seth: I agree, a plausible interpretation and quite different than what Grant says.&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps with the generals he established his insight immediately by getting inside what many were already thinking &#8212; with humor (emotion). They were then attached to perceiving him as &#8220;insightful&#8221; and framed his observations that way, had a positive cognitive bias that led to confirmation bias as they heard him talk. In working with other people for the first time, I always try hard to impress them initially&#8230;. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a fascinating story&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Seth: I agree, a plausible interpretation and quite different than what Grant says.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;You Can&#8217;t Change Something Unless You Love It&#8221;: The Case of Dr. Gilmer and Dr. Gilmer by Duncan</title>
		<link>http://blog.sethroberts.net/2013/05/19/you-cant-change-something-unless-you-love-it-the-case-of-dr-gilmer-and-dr-gilmer/#comment-1114525</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sethroberts.net/?p=10273#comment-1114525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By happy chance, I just read this typo on Dave Winer&#039;s blog: &quot;So let&#039;s solove the problem.&quot;
http://threads2.scripting.com/2013/may/usersMailListForDropbox]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By happy chance, I just read this typo on Dave Winer&#8217;s blog: &#8220;So let&#8217;s solove the problem.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://threads2.scripting.com/2013/may/usersMailListForDropbox" rel="nofollow">http://threads2.scripting.com/2013/may/usersMailListForDropbox</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;You Can&#8217;t Change Something Unless You Love It&#8221;: The Case of Dr. Gilmer and Dr. Gilmer by Jon</title>
		<link>http://blog.sethroberts.net/2013/05/19/you-cant-change-something-unless-you-love-it-the-case-of-dr-gilmer-and-dr-gilmer/#comment-1114473</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sethroberts.net/?p=10273#comment-1114473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allen K., 

I agree with you whole heartedly. We need to help those that truly care about good governance by getting rid of the monopoly of government, or rather, statism. This would enable those that truly care about others, through the free market, to help their fellow countrymen.

As we saw from Seth&#039;s anecdotal story (which holds much truth) the monopolies don&#039;t work, it is the individual who has interest in making a difference that does. Unfortunately monopolies only create bureaucratic entities that don&#039;t care about their customers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allen K., </p>
<p>I agree with you whole heartedly. We need to help those that truly care about good governance by getting rid of the monopoly of government, or rather, statism. This would enable those that truly care about others, through the free market, to help their fellow countrymen.</p>
<p>As we saw from Seth&#8217;s anecdotal story (which holds much truth) the monopolies don&#8217;t work, it is the individual who has interest in making a difference that does. Unfortunately monopolies only create bureaucratic entities that don&#8217;t care about their customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;You Can&#8217;t Change Something Unless You Love It&#8221;: The Case of Dr. Gilmer and Dr. Gilmer by Jon</title>
		<link>http://blog.sethroberts.net/2013/05/19/you-cant-change-something-unless-you-love-it-the-case-of-dr-gilmer-and-dr-gilmer/#comment-1114471</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sethroberts.net/?p=10273#comment-1114471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As such government should get out of the way of people that love to help others. Remove licensing laws (AKA &quot;grants of monopoly&quot;).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As such government should get out of the way of people that love to help others. Remove licensing laws (AKA &#8220;grants of monopoly&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Journal of Personal Science: One Child’s Autism Eliminated by Removal of Glutamate From Her Diet by Mike H</title>
		<link>http://blog.sethroberts.net/2013/05/17/journal-of-personal-science-one-childs-autism-eliminated-by-removal-of-glutamate-from-her-diet/#comment-1114448</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 01:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sethroberts.net/?p=10417#comment-1114448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just stumbled on this site, but the older posts on this subject were closed to comments so I just thought I&#039;d comment here. I&#039;m a Vitamin D and sleep enthusiast, but the theory I follow has nothing to do with the time you take Vitamin D. Instead, it&#039;s all about what your level is. (60 - 80 ng/ml being optimal). I didn&#039;t see her theory mentioned anywhere so I thought I would direct you to it. 

http://drgominak.com/

I also highly recommend her YouTube videos. I think she&#039;s onto the real mechanism between Vitamin D and sleep.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just stumbled on this site, but the older posts on this subject were closed to comments so I just thought I&#8217;d comment here. I&#8217;m a Vitamin D and sleep enthusiast, but the theory I follow has nothing to do with the time you take Vitamin D. Instead, it&#8217;s all about what your level is. (60 &#8211; 80 ng/ml being optimal). I didn&#8217;t see her theory mentioned anywhere so I thought I would direct you to it. </p>
<p><a href="http://drgominak.com/" rel="nofollow">http://drgominak.com/</a></p>
<p>I also highly recommend her YouTube videos. I think she&#8217;s onto the real mechanism between Vitamin D and sleep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;You Can&#8217;t Change Something Unless You Love It&#8221;: The Case of Dr. Gilmer and Dr. Gilmer by Tom</title>
		<link>http://blog.sethroberts.net/2013/05/19/you-cant-change-something-unless-you-love-it-the-case-of-dr-gilmer-and-dr-gilmer/#comment-1114388</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sethroberts.net/?p=10273#comment-1114388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Without love, you not only can&#039;t change something, you can&#039;t even truly understand it. Loving a thing gives you the opportunity to know it. 

This is also true of creative endeavors. Sometimes people who don&#039;t like a given creative genre – say, country music – will still set out to write something in the idiom, thinking it is &quot;easy.&quot; 

They invariably do atrocious work. 

The audience for creative works – and perhaps for things like cities, phones, etc  – is itself there in the hopes of loving the thing. So only through love does the creator have even a chance of creating a thing a user would love.

Love from creators is crucial yet undervalued. And the result on the audiences&#039; side is delight, which is also usually an afterthought. 

A good case in point is New York&#039;s repurposing of the disused elevated train tracks into a park. For years it was mocked as a foolish idea. Now cities all over the world are falling over themselves to create their own parks in the sky.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without love, you not only can&#8217;t change something, you can&#8217;t even truly understand it. Loving a thing gives you the opportunity to know it. </p>
<p>This is also true of creative endeavors. Sometimes people who don&#8217;t like a given creative genre – say, country music – will still set out to write something in the idiom, thinking it is &#8220;easy.&#8221; </p>
<p>They invariably do atrocious work. </p>
<p>The audience for creative works – and perhaps for things like cities, phones, etc  – is itself there in the hopes of loving the thing. So only through love does the creator have even a chance of creating a thing a user would love.</p>
<p>Love from creators is crucial yet undervalued. And the result on the audiences&#8217; side is delight, which is also usually an afterthought. </p>
<p>A good case in point is New York&#8217;s repurposing of the disused elevated train tracks into a park. For years it was mocked as a foolish idea. Now cities all over the world are falling over themselves to create their own parks in the sky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;You Can&#8217;t Change Something Unless You Love It&#8221;: The Case of Dr. Gilmer and Dr. Gilmer by idyll</title>
		<link>http://blog.sethroberts.net/2013/05/19/you-cant-change-something-unless-you-love-it-the-case-of-dr-gilmer-and-dr-gilmer/#comment-1114329</link>
		<dc:creator>idyll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 13:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sethroberts.net/?p=10273#comment-1114329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A corollary: if people do NOT love an institution, it will change, but not for the better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A corollary: if people do NOT love an institution, it will change, but not for the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;You Can&#8217;t Change Something Unless You Love It&#8221;: The Case of Dr. Gilmer and Dr. Gilmer by Allen K.</title>
		<link>http://blog.sethroberts.net/2013/05/19/you-cant-change-something-unless-you-love-it-the-case-of-dr-gilmer-and-dr-gilmer/#comment-1114320</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 12:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sethroberts.net/?p=10273#comment-1114320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course, where this point is present in American op-ed thinking is in those that call for government-hater politicians to get out of the way of those who would actually attempt good governance.

&lt;strong&gt;Seth: You might be right: people who dislike government will be bad at it. But the original claim is about the objects of governance.&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, where this point is present in American op-ed thinking is in those that call for government-hater politicians to get out of the way of those who would actually attempt good governance.</p>
<p><strong>Seth: You might be right: people who dislike government will be bad at it. But the original claim is about the objects of governance.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Journal of Personal Science: One Child’s Autism Eliminated by Removal of Glutamate From Her Diet by babar</title>
		<link>http://blog.sethroberts.net/2013/05/17/journal-of-personal-science-one-childs-autism-eliminated-by-removal-of-glutamate-from-her-diet/#comment-1114191</link>
		<dc:creator>babar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sethroberts.net/?p=10417#comment-1114191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well she&#039;s lucky her kid wasn&#039;t an extremely picky eater (this means that any change with eating routines causes extreme anxiety) like many kids on or near the spectrum.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well she&#8217;s lucky her kid wasn&#8217;t an extremely picky eater (this means that any change with eating routines causes extreme anxiety) like many kids on or near the spectrum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Journal of Personal Science: One Child’s Autism Eliminated by Removal of Glutamate From Her Diet by AlexiDSadeski</title>
		<link>http://blog.sethroberts.net/2013/05/17/journal-of-personal-science-one-childs-autism-eliminated-by-removal-of-glutamate-from-her-diet/#comment-1114156</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexiDSadeski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sethroberts.net/?p=10417#comment-1114156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seth, you have been advocating a lot of fermented foods. Does Katie&#039;s research change your mind on that at all?

Katie, do you see things like sauerkraut having an affect on your daughter? Have you stopped eating fermented foods and would you recommend that to others?

&lt;strong&gt;Seth: No, this work doesn&#039;t change my mind. The benefits of fermented food are clearly huge. Maybe some people are more sensitive to glutamate than usual -- perhaps for enviromental reasons, perhaps for genetic reasons. Sauerkraut is not fermented protein; only fermenting protein produces glutamate.&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth, you have been advocating a lot of fermented foods. Does Katie&#8217;s research change your mind on that at all?</p>
<p>Katie, do you see things like sauerkraut having an affect on your daughter? Have you stopped eating fermented foods and would you recommend that to others?</p>
<p><strong>Seth: No, this work doesn&#8217;t change my mind. The benefits of fermented food are clearly huge. Maybe some people are more sensitive to glutamate than usual &#8212; perhaps for enviromental reasons, perhaps for genetic reasons. Sauerkraut is not fermented protein; only fermenting protein produces glutamate.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Assorted Links by Nancy Lebovitz</title>
		<link>http://blog.sethroberts.net/2013/05/18/assorted-links-257/#comment-1114128</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Lebovitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sethroberts.net/?p=10357#comment-1114128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As for Roxio and many other problems, cheap reliable quantitative chemical analysis would help a lot. When I say &quot;cheap&quot;, I mean cheap enough that a lot of people have their own kits.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for Roxio and many other problems, cheap reliable quantitative chemical analysis would help a lot. When I say &#8220;cheap&#8221;, I mean cheap enough that a lot of people have their own kits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Assorted Links by Nancy Lebovitz</title>
		<link>http://blog.sethroberts.net/2013/05/18/assorted-links-257/#comment-1114127</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Lebovitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sethroberts.net/?p=10357#comment-1114127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news about the Yelp reviews of prisons-- if Kermit Gosnell&#039;s abortion clinic had been reviewed, I don&#039;t think it could have been that bad for that long.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news about the Yelp reviews of prisons&#8211; if Kermit Gosnell&#8217;s abortion clinic had been reviewed, I don&#8217;t think it could have been that bad for that long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Assorted Links by ChristianKl</title>
		<link>http://blog.sethroberts.net/2013/05/18/assorted-links-257/#comment-1114061</link>
		<dc:creator>ChristianKl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 13:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sethroberts.net/?p=10357#comment-1114061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Ranbaxy is an Indian company jailing it&#039;s owners is something that the Indian government should do. It&#039;s probably not the job of the US government to jail the executive of the companies of foreign countries.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Ranbaxy is an Indian company jailing it&#8217;s owners is something that the Indian government should do. It&#8217;s probably not the job of the US government to jail the executive of the companies of foreign countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
